AAlliance Trust has blamed the EU referendum for its slipping well behind a new benchmark in the first half of 2016, after a slide in June reversed gains of the previous five months.
Total shareholder return was 2.6per cent and net asset value (NAV) total return 6.6per cent, against 12 per cent for its world index benchmark.
The £3.3billion trust, which introduced the formal benchmark at the end of 2015, has underperformed it on both return measures over one, three and five years, its illustration shows.
Lord Smith of Kelvin, the chairman, said it was down to "turbulent market conditions around the EU referendum" but that the share price had since reached new highs.
He added: “In volatile markets we continue to make good progress against the initiatives outlined last year to enhance shareholder value.” He said costs were coming down and the savings and investment subsidiaries were “making good strides towards profitability”.
The chairman said a strategic review, announced after a short-lived approach from RIT Capital Partners was confirmed, had a “broad range of potential courses of action” and was progressing well.
The manager’s report says the financial sector held back performance as two core holdings - Prudential and Legal & General - performed poorly over the period. “Both companies have been hit by fears around the implications of the EU referendum, particularly the risk that higher interest rates and bond yields in the UK are now many years away.”
The trust also had 16.7per cent in the UK, against 6.4per cent for the benchmark, “which also pressured performance" the report says.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel