THE Co-operative Group said profits have been sliced in half as restructuring costs and investments in price cuts at its convenience stores and staff pay took their toll on the firm.
Pre-tax profit for the first half of the year fell 53 per cent from £36 million to £17m, while revenue nudged up 2.2 per cent to £4.7 billion.
Chief executive Richard Pennycook insisted the group's turnaround, dubbed Rebuild, is on track.
He said: "Revenues across the group have grown and, in line with our strategy, profitability has fallen due to our major Rebuild investment, pay increases for our people and price cuts for our customers.
"We are only halfway through the Rebuild and much remains to be done, whether it is investing in our digital capability or campaigning on key issues. We remain firmly on track with our plans and are encouraged that the work we are doing is attracting more and more people back to the Co-op."
Like-for-like sales at its food arm grew 3.1 per cent over the period, with the Co-op hailing six consecutive quarters of positive growth. Like-for-like sales at its convenience store business grew 4.3 per cent, but the firm added that its financial performance has been impacted by an 8.5 per cent pay award for shop workers.
At its funeral business, underlying profit fell from £47m to £42m as the group said that a lower death rate was offset by an increase in "pre-paid funeral plans".
Sales at its insurance arm performed well, with gross written premiums rising 29 per cent to £242m and underlying operating profit rising from £2m to £11m.
However, the firm booked a £45m write-down on its stake in Co-op Bank, with the company saying that it now values its shareholding at £140m, "consistent with falls in bank valuations generally".
In April, Mr Pennycook asked the board to slash his pay from £1.25m to £750,000 as the troubled mutual entered "calmer waters".
The mutual was struggling through a series of scandals when Mr Pennycook was appointed in 2014, including claims that former Co-op Bank chairman Paul Flowers had bought drugs and the discovery of a £1.5 billion black hole in its banking unit.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here