SCOTTISH ministers have been accused of getting their sums wrong over plans to pay key university officials.
Under proposed new legislation the chairs of universities' powerful ruling Courts are to be remunerated for the first time.
The Higher Education (Scotland) Governance Bill suggests chairs should be paid £512 a day and estimates the number of days worked as five or six - based on the number of Court meetings a year.
The Scottish Government's explanatory memorandum on the Bill states: "It is anticipated that modest costs associated with this provision will be absorbed within existing budgets of higher education institutions.
"Attributing this to all higher education institutions..... would suggest a cost..... of £3,072 per annum which, when multiplied by the 18 higher education institutions affected by this provision of the Bill, would equate to a total approximate cost of £55,296 per annum."
However, documents from individual universities suggest the average amount of time worked by university chairs can be more than 50 days a year resulting in an actual cost to the sector of at least £460,000 if these days were also subject to payment.
Universities Scotland, which represents university principals, said the underestimation of the amount of time worked by chairs showed a "lack of sound analysis".
A spokeswoman said: "The Bill significantly underestimates the time commitment required of chairs. The role is of vital importance in a university's system of governance and chairing the governing body, which meets four or five times a year, is only a very small part of their responsibilities.
"Universities typically ask their chairs for a time commitment of around 50 days a year. This is realistic, yet the Bill's financial memorandum estimates a commitment of only six days a year.
"If chairs were to give only six days' worth of commitment to their universities good governance would not be strengthened, it would be massively undermined."
Universities Scotland went on to warn that the issue over remuneration was an example of wider fears over the Bill.
The spokeswoman added: ""Practically speaking this means the financial assumptions made in the Bill are way off and we are concerned at the lack of sound analysis. But the time and money is not the real problem. It is symptomatic of a much wider set of problems with the Bill which need a lot more thought.
"If passed in its current form the Bill would cut across a lot of existing legislation and good practice and could work to undermine aspects of the strong system of governance we already have in higher education. We are raising these concerns with the Scottish Government. We hope it will be open to what we have to say."
Liz Smith, young people spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservatives, accusing ministers of a "complete lack of understanding" of the work of university chairs.
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said the payments had been calculated on the basis of chairing court meetings.
She said: "Reference to the days worked by a chair in the financial memorandum to the Bill focuses squarely on chairing meetings of the court. The Bill sets out a new power for Scottish ministers to oblige institutions to remunerate chairs for this work for the first time.
"Other duties carried out by chairs will vary by institution." She said they would consider all constructive suggestions.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel