THE welfare reforms being spearheaded by Tory minister Iain Duncan Smith are causing “devastating harm” to the most vulnerable in society, campaigners have warned.
And further cuts being planned to disability benefits will push many more people "closer to the edge", according to leading charities.
Dr Simon Duffy, director of think-tank The Centre for Welfare Reform, said disabled people had been a “prime target” for cuts by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).
He told the Sunday Herald: “There is a cynical disregard for the rights of disabled people and their families.
“It is a group that is easy to cut, and it is easy to disguise the cuts behind bureaucratic so-called reforms.
“I think Iain Duncan Smith dreams of being a great reformer – what he will find himself to have done, and what history will have judged him to have done, is cause devastating harm to the most vulnerable people in our communities.”
Duncan Smith has insisted the aim of the shake-up of the welfare system is to “restore people’s lives” and tackle the “something for nothing” benefit culture inherited from Labour.
In October he told the Tory conference that many of the long-term sick and those with disabilities wanted to return to employment.
He said: “We won’t lift you out of poverty by simply transferring taxpayers’ money to you. With our help, you’ll work your way out of poverty.”
But Duffy said figures showed around £17 billion of benefits go unclaimed every year, either because people do not know they are entitled to it or because they were “too shamed by the system” to claim what they are due. In contrast, he said, benefit fraud accounts for around £1billion every year.
He said changes to benefits – for example, having Personal Independence Payment (PIP) replacing Disability Living Allowance (DLA) - would reduce levels of eligibility for many people.
“PIP is markedly less generous than DLA and is meant to cut out entitlement for hundreds of thousands of people will lose their entitlement to DLA as the benefit is transformed into PIP,” he said.
“When you get your PIP it may be less generous than DLA or in a small number of cases it may be more generous.
“That allows the government to claim that it is so-called targeting (of benefits), but the overall objective is to cut the level of spending.”
Charities have also raised concerns about plans to cut £30 a week from some claimants of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), a type of disability benefit.
The proposal was announced by chancellor George Osborne in the July budget as a way of providing an incentive for claimants to return to work.
But Phil Reynolds, Parkinson’s UK Policy and Campaigns Advisor and co-chair of the Disability Benefits Consortium, said: “Our research reveals seven in ten people said cuts to ESA would cause their health to suffer, with almost half saying it would mean they would probably return to work later.
“Cutting disability benefits will push people who are struggling to make ends meet even closer to the edge, and will cause enormous suffering and anxiety.
“We urge the Government to immediately reassess the impact of benefits cuts on people with disabilities and long term conditions, and scrap the proposed cuts completely.”
The DWP has previously said it is “absolutely committed” to supporting disabled people and spends around £50billion a year on disabled people and their services.
Earlier this year the Sunday Herald revealed how United Nations officials had launched a probe to investigate allegations that Westminster welfare reforms have led to “grave or systematic violations” of disabled people’s human rights.
Last month a shocking report found the introduction of tougher-fit-to-work tests for sick and disabled people could be linked with up to 590 additional suicides and 279,000 cases of mental ill-health between 2010 and 2013 in England. The DWP challenged the report’s findings – carried out by experts from the universities of Liverpool and Oxford – as “misleading”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel