Ex-prisoners looking for careers in the Civil Service will not have to disclose their past convictions when they first submit their job applications, David Cameron has announced.
The Prime Minister said he wanted to ensure that ex-offenders were not rejected for jobs outright before they had even had a chance to show their worth.
Whitehall is adopting a US-style "ban the box" system - removing the box on application forms which candidates are required to tick if they have unspent convictions.
Although they will eventually have to declare their offences, Mr Cameron said that it would remove an important first hurdle to them getting a job and urged other employers to follow suit.
"Ex-offenders are often rejected for jobs outright because of their past. I want us to build a country where the shame of prior convictions doesn't necessarily hold people back from working and providing for their families," he said.
"Of course, I want businesses and organisations to know who they are interviewing. If a conviction is unspent they need to know about it and make the right decision for them, for that business."
"But here's my question: Should offenders have to declare it up-front, before the first sift of CVs - before they've been able to state their case? Or might this be done a bit later, at interview stage or before an actual offer of work is made?"
Setting out plans for wide-ranging reform of the prison system, the Prime Minister said it was the Government's mission to turn "remorse and regret into lives with new meaning, finding diamonds in the rough and helping them shine".
Mr Cameron said he was "hugely frustrated" by security failings that allowed prisoners to readily access social media or saw prisons apparently "awash with alcohol and drugs".
But he rejected "lazy" claims that prison was a "holiday camp", insisting they were "often miserable, painful environments: isolation, mental anguish, idleness, bullying, self-harm, violence, suicide.
"Is it a sensible strategy to allow these environments to become twisted into places that just compound the damage and make people worse, or should we be making sure prisons are demanding places of positivity and reform so that we can maximise the chances of people going straight when they come up?"
He said the present system was "infantilising" senior staff as he set out plans to create six new "reform" prisons where proven governors would have "total discretion" over how they spent their budgets - on the model of academy schools.
Whitehall at present sets national limits on the number of jigsaws, sheets of music and pairs of pants a prisoner could have in their cell, he said, saying the freedoms would eventually be extended across the prison system.
There would also be a new "financial incentive scheme" for high-performing staff, he said, and a boost given to schemes to attract good graduates to the profession.
They would be judged in new league tables, based on measures such as re-offending rates, post-sentence employment, the numbers released into permanent accommodation and levels of literacy and numeracy.
The reform prisons would pilot "co-commissioning" of mental health services between prison governors and NHS England to ensure services were better tailored to each institution. If successful, the system would be introduced nationwide from 2017, he said.
In other measures, police are to be given new powers to speed up the deportation of foreign offenders - who will be required by law to declare their nationality in court - while ministers will work with mobile network operators to block mobile signals in jails.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here