UNESCO cultural advisers are poised to hold an investigation into building in Edinburgh's Old and New Town World Heritage Site status.
It was claimed by the Scotsman that Unesco acted after an official report called for a “serious investigation” into the way the city’s Old and New Towns are being managed.
The UK and Scottish governments have been asked about the handling of the world heritage site following a warning from advisers, it has now been reported.
The city council was said to have been asked to explain its stewardship of the site.
Ian Perry, the council’s planning leader, was reported as saying: “The present and past planning committees have had a duty to maintain the world heritage site.
"However there is always a tension between the desire to develop within the site and the preservation of its architectural heritage. Clearly there are differing views about how this should be interpreted.
“It is the planning committee’s job to try to allow development to happen without damaging the built heritage of Edinburgh, which in the past has proven difficult and some of the developments have obviously been controversial.
"The present planning committee will now be looking at the management of the world heritage site and will review what has happened in the past.
"If we think there need to be changes we will then consult the Edinburgh World Heritage Trust.”
It was reported in October a probe could be set up.
That came after a two-day visit by investigators which was prompted by concerns over developments including plans to turn the former Royal High School, pictured above, into a £75m luxury hotel and the £850m St James Centre development, below.
The UK national committee of the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), which has a special role as official adviser to Unesco, criticised the planning culture in the city.
The advisers said: "Evidence of the potentially negative impacts of cumulative new developments is becoming increasingly apparent."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel