The biggest ever inquiry in Scotland will result in a two-tier system for child abuse survivors, according to victims' groups.
Campaigners made the claim after meeting Education Secretary Angela Constance yesterday, with one saying it had 'not been pleasant.'
They were angry over her refusal to extend the scope of the inquiry to include people who were abused as children in non residential settings such as schools, church parishes and nurseries.
However, others said progress had been made.
Andi Lavery, of White Flowers Alba, which represents those abused while in the care of the Catholic Church, said Ms Constance had been unwilling to discuss many of the issues being raised.
He said she could not explain why victims of abuse in non-residential settings would not be covered.
"Victims of Catholic abuse are excluded," he said "It is a disgrace. I don't think it is bigotry, but I feel discriminated against."
But plans to lift the time bar, which currently prevents most abuse victims from taking civil actions against their alleged abusers, will not help anyone abused before 1964, under a law known as prescription.
Ms Constance told the groups the legal barriers to changing the time bar were difficult to overcome.
Helen Holland, of In Care Abuse Survivors Scotland said there should be no distinction for child abuse victims just because they did not live in the care setting where the offences happened.
She added: "If the inquiry doesn't hear from people abused in the parish setting, it is denying them the right to participate.
"Lifting the time bar will not help people abused before 1964. We are going to end up with a two tier justice system. This should cover all of Scotland's abused children."
Plans to initiate legislation to remove the bar before the end of this parliamentary session have been welcomed by victims.
However, Ms Holland had been unwilling or unable to change the terms of the inquiry to include victims of child abuse who are not currently covered. "It was not a pleasant meeting. I think Ms Constance answered as much as she could," she said.
Labour MSP Graham Pearson said he sympathised with their concerns.
"The minister was unable to explain why the inquiry's scope had been limited and I think she has to revisit that," he said.
"It is difficult to explain to a survivor that their evidence cannot be heard by the inquiry if their abuse did not take place in residential care. It sends the message that they are not worth as much. It shouldn't matter if you have been abused whether it was residential or otherwise."
He said it was important to learn from what had happened in the past, "Since the inquiry was launched, more than £1million has been spent and not a single hearing has yet taken place," he added
The risk of delay is the main reason the Scottish Government has given for not extending the inquiry's remit.
Ms Constance said: "The inquiry must be sufficiently focused to make clear and meaningful recommendations that will avoid a repeat of the systemic, institutional failings that saw children abused by the very individuals who were entrusted by the state and others to care for them."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here