Former Conservative Party chairman Grant Shapps has insisted he is not to blame for alleged breaches in election spending.
Electoral watchdogs are meeting with police and prosecutors in a bid to ensure they do not run out of time to launch possible criminal investigations into Tory funding of the 2015 general election campaign.
Read more: Millionaire fraudster and Lib Dem donor faces fresh money-laundering probe
The party faces claims that accommodation costs of activists bussed into key constituencies around the country should have been recorded under individual candidates' limits, rather than as part of the national campaign.
Mr Shapps, who was co-chairman with Lord Feldman during the campaign, insisted that as far as he was aware the paperwork "was all correctly done", and said he knew nothing about how the money was being spent.
Read more: Grant Shapps resigns amid claims of inaction over Tory bullying allegations
He told BBC Two's Daily Politics: "I was co-chairman but compliance wasn't my side of things. The campaigning side was my side, but not the money and the finance."
Pressed on whether Lord Feldman was responsible for spending compliance, he replied: "Other people. I don't want to go into more detail."
Read more: Tory chairman Lord Feldman interviewed as witness over bullying row
The Electoral Commission believes its ongoing probe into alleged breaches of reporting obligations will take at least another month - taking it past the one-year time limit for launching criminal proceedings.
It is meeting with police forces covering the constituencies involved and the Crown Prosecution Service to ask them to seek an extension to ensure the door is not closed.
Claims about the Conservatives' general election spending - as well as that at three parliamentary by-elections - were raised by The Daily Mirror and Channel 4 News.
The party blames an "administrative error" for failing to register some accommodation costs.
But David Cameron insists it was right to include such expenditure as part of the national campaign rather than against the limits imposed on individual candidates.
Bob Posner, director of party and election finance and legal counsel at the Electoral Commission, said: "The police and the CPS both have the power to apply to the courts to extend the time limit on bringing criminal prosecutions for electoral offences to allow for full investigations to take place. We have requested that they consider doing this."
The commission said it did not take any view as to whether the party should be pursued under the Representation of the People Act (RPA) 1983, which regulates candidate spending.
But if no extension is sought, the ability to do so will expire a year after the submission of returns - which had to be with the Electoral Commission within 35 days of the election on May 7, 2015.
An extension can be sought by the Director of Public Prosecutions.
Making a false declaration in relation to candidate spending carries a punishment of up to a year in jail and/or an unlimited fine - and anyone found guilty is barred from standing for election as an MP or holding elected office for three years.
No police investigation has yet been launched but the commission said it seemed "sensible for the criminal justice agencies to retain the ability to take action should appropriate evidence come to light as part of the commission's own investigation".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel