COUNCILLORS are being urged to reject plans for a wind farm with turbines almost as high as the Forth Road Bridge towers, less than four miles south of Fort Augustus.
The developers of the Culachy Wind Farm have already reduced the number of turbines from 25 to 13, but plan to make them taller.
The Mountaineering Council of Scotland (MCofS) say they would be too near the Corrieyairack Pass and historic Wade Road and would be in a recognised area of wild land.
Highland Council's South Planning Application Committee will visit the site tomorrow and make a decision on Monday
David Gibson, chief executive officer of MCofS said: “With the Paris climate talks ongoing, we are all very aware of the need to reduce emissions and in general to tread more lightly upon the earth. That doesn’t justify building wind farms in the wrong places and accordingly we are calling on the Planning Committee to reject the Culachy Wind Farm application.
"The south-western Monadhliath (mountains) deserve better than to be converted into an industrial site for the sake of a scheme that would produce barely one quarter of one per cent of Scotland’s electricity.”
But developers RES say that if granted planning permission, Culachy Wind Farm would be capable of generating enough renewable electricity to meet the average annual requirements of at least 30,000 homes.
They say it would also provide a community benefit fund of between £78,000 - £88,000 per year over the 25-year life of the development. This would allow local people to invest in projects which would benefit the communities around the wind farm.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel