Vets saved the life of a dog who swallowed a six-inch bone whole - causing his x-rays to shown what appeared to be a spare rib.
One-year-old Mastiff-type dog Chico wolfed down the cow rib bone in one and left vets astounded that he escaped injury.
Senior PDSA vet Susie Hermit said: "I've never seen an x-ray like it before, the position of the bone really did look like Chico had an extra rib.
"Amazingly, he'd managed to swallow the bone whole but didn't seem to be in any pain.
"However, we knew we had to carry out emergency surgery to remove it because it could have caused a life-threatening tear to his stomach or intestines."
Chico's owner, Craig Anderson, 41, from Newlands, Glasgow, bought the rib bone for his pet as a treat.
He said: "I thought if I supervised him it would be fine but he literally swallowed it in one mouthful.
"He seemed fine but I knew he wouldn't be able to digest it properly so I took him straight to PDSA.
"I was so worried while he was in the operating theatre. It's a miracle the bone didn't cause any damage.
"It goes without saying but I don't give bones to him any more after this. It's definitely a case of once bitten, twice shy."
Vets at the PDSA's Glasgow Shamrock Street pet hospital, where Chico was treated, warned owners against giving pets bones as they can cause digestive tract damage and blockages which require surgery and can be fatal.
Bones were the most common items removed from pets' stomachs by PDSA vets last year, with 59 cases seen. They also dealt with 29 cases involving corn on the cob and 28 pets swallowing stones.
The organisation is educating pet owners about inappropriate foods for their animals in a project funded by the People's Postcode Lottery.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article