WHILE agreeing with much of Emma Witney’s comments regarding Police Scotland (Letters, July 22) I think it is unrealistic to expect policing to be separate from the politics of the day. Were the police to be more independent and farther outwith governmental control the risk of a vigilante, street-militia force would dangerously increase.
But whether a de-regionalised approach to policing is preferable, as appears to have happened with the setting up of Police Scotland, is complex in its pros and cons. The apparent urge for the change has been cost-saving but cost-saving isn’t always as simple and straightforward as it seems. What about life-saving? What about preserving peace in communities?
As mentioned by Emma Witney, concerns about arming police in what is a mainly rural area (the region formerly policed by Northern Constabulary), and the recent apparent neglect of a phone call from a concerned member of the public about a car having come off the M9 road, point to both safety and peace perhaps being sacrificed in the quest to save money by transferring police authority from local to national control.
Emergency calls to the police are often made by people who can identify local reference points that are not in sat-nav, ordnance survey, or street plan format. In such instances of panic, turmoil and so on, local knowledge is paramount.
All the electronic wizardry in the world will often not match this local familiarity. Therefore, maybe it is time to re-assess such matters and perhaps extends the perspective a bit.
Ian Johnstone,
84 Forman Drive, Peterhead.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here