FIRST we have an English MP referring Michelle Thomson to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner (“Thomson reported to sleaze watchdog”, The Herald, October 7) then we have a Labour MSP doing likewise (“Labour voices own call for parliament’s standards commissioner to probe Thomson deals”, The Herald, October 8).

So far as can be ascertained the complaint is that Ms Thomson indulged in some questionable practices involving house purchases and took advantage of vulnerable people. It has to be emphasised that on TV news items the person cited originally as an aggrieved victim stated clearly and explicitly that she simply wanted to get rid of her house and was content with the sale price at the time. She is only now upset since Ms Thomson appeared to have made a large profit.

It should also be noted that the alleged activities took place long before Ms Thomson became an MP and even before she was nominated as a parliamentary candidate. How then could she have broken parliamentary rules or brought the House of Commons into disrepute?

If the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner does accept this case then I suggest that many present MPs should be worried. I doubt that all 650 or so other MPs have completely unblemished business activities, either prior to their being elected or current. It would give an enterprising investigative journalist a wonderful opportunity to make a name. Investigation of the business history of all MPs would, I am sure, prove a goldmine for scandal.

If Ms Thomson has committed a crime and is brought to court then, and only then, can the matter be raised legitimately. The MP and MSP who have done so have diminished what little reputation they previously had.

John Scott Roy,

42 Galloway Avenue, Ayr.