By Emilia Hanna
I passed my driving test more than 10years ago but I can remember my sense of pride and freedom as if it were yesterday. Learning to drive marked my transition into adulthood. Unfortunately, the reality of owning a car can be quite different. When you’re late for work for the umpteenth time because of traffic jams and hold ups, or when it’s time to pay your insurance, that metal box can be frustrating
Driving is not the easiest or most environmentally conscious choice, yet often it feels like there is little alternative. In Scotland, more than two-thirds of people get to work by car, compared with just three per cent who cycle.
The “Car is King” culture is harming us and the planet. It causes air pollution and is responsible for more than 2,000 early deaths in a year. The transport sector pours out almost as much carbon dioxide today as in 1990 and is the second largest single source of climate change emissions in the country.
If we had fewer cars on the roads and a system with cheap, accessible and environmentally sustainable transport options, the sector would be more socially just, would cut carbon emissions and our journey times would be quicker.
There are a few transport solutions the next Scottish Government could implement to persuade more people to leave the car at home and take a greener route to their destination.
First, it could make 20mph the default speed limit in towns and cities. A review of the first 200 such zones across the UK saw average speed reductions of 9mph, and traffic flow within the zones falling by 27 per cent. The annual number of accidents also fell by 60 per cent.
By fostering a safer road culture, 20mph zones can lead to higher rates of walking and cycling. Edinburgh Council has already decided that "twenty is plenty" and, with Glasgow and Dundee councils looking at these zones, the Government should set a new standard for safer streets.
Secondly, the Government should encourage parking levies for workplaces and other destinations such as supermarkets, to be negotiated with trade unions. The UK’s first workplace parking levy in Nottingham has cut the number of people driving to work. The scheme has raised more than £25 million in its first three years, which is being ploughed back into upgrading the city’s train station and expanding the tram network.
Congestion charging is another idea that has found success. London’s charge has seen traffic levels inside the charging zone drop by 75,000 vehicles a day, equivalent to a 20 per cent decrease, with the level of congestion on roads around the zone also down. Transport for London predicts that the number of cyclists entering the city at rush hour will surpass the number of car drivers.
Local businesses in the zone continue to thrive, with central London’s retail sector producing year-on-year growth. The £122m generated annually by the charge is spent on providing more bus services, improving road safety and implementing energy efficiency measures in transport.
The incoming Government should examine smart ticketing and ways to cut the costs of public transport to reverse the worrying trend whereby usage has fallen by six per cent over the past decade.
Smart ticketing systems like the Oyster card in London reduce queuing times, can cut fares for card holders and make public transport handier.
Finally, our rates of cycling are growing but not rapidly enough. Some people are braving the roads but a bigger number feel cycling is too risky. By increasing its spending on active travel year on year, Edinburgh has seen levels of cycling soar, with almost 12 per cent of trips to work by bike in the city.
If, in the next Parliament, the Scottish Government were to increase its investment in walking and cycling from 1.9 per cent to 10 per cent of total transport budget, this would go a long way to boosting cycling levels.
Measures such as these stand to benefit the climate, our economy, and our health so it is time for the Scottish Government to introduce the shake-up in transport that is urgently needed.
Emilia Hanna is Friends of the Earth Scotland’s air pollution campaigner. FoES is part of the Stop Climate Chaos Scotland coalition.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel