By Richard Dixon
When the steam turbines at Longannet power station cease to turn at the end of this month there will be no coal being burned for electricity production anywhere in Scotland for the first time in at least 115 years. For a country which virtually invented the Industrial Revolution, this will be a hugely significant step, the beginning of the end for fossil fuels in Scotland.
It all started in 1901 when Pinkston power station at Glasgow’s Port Dundas started burning coal to make the electricity to run Glasgow’s trams and street lighting. Other stations came and went, with the twin chimneys at Cockenzie finally coming down last autumn.
The last remaining plant, Longannet, started generating in1970 and was then the largest coal-fired power station in Europe. Today it is still the second largest coal station in the UK and the third largest in Europe.
The station has been burning around 4.5 million tonnes of coal a year but less than 40 per cent of the energy in the coal ends up as useful electricity; the rest goes up the chimney or warms up the waters of the Forth. And in recent years much of that coal has been imported from anywhere in the world with low prices.
A long-lived feat of engineering it may be but we will be well rid of the climate, environment and health impacts of Longannet when it shuts.
Coal is the dirtiest of the main fossil fuels and, in a peak year, Longannet was producing 10 million tonnes of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas. This one single station was responsible for one fifth of all of Scotland’s climate change emissions. Shutting it down will be great news in the struggle to reduce our emissions.
The brownish smog that frequently envelopes the upper Forth comes from a combination of emissions from Longannet, the plants at Grangemouth and traffic, with Longannet contributing 500 tonnes of fine particles a year. A 2013 report concluded that health impacts from Longannet shortened people’s lives, with 4,210 “life years” lost in 2010.
Globally, we have about fives times as much coal, oil and gas as we can possibly afford to burn to avoid catastrophic climate change. Most of it has got to stay where it is if we are to prevent disaster. The market is beginning to understand this. Around the world coal prices are collapsing and coal companies are going out of business. Coal-fired plants are being mothballed in Germany where electricity companies were too slow to realise that the country’s massive increase in solar was going to make coal unviable. China, once famous for building coal stations at a tremendous rate, is about to close down the last one in the Beijing area.
Of course, closing Longannet will be difficult for the local economy, as major transitions always are. Many ScottishPower employees are being redeployed within the company, with a taskforce looking at the future of the area. ScottishPower owns large areas of land at and around the power station site and there are already proposals being made for a renewable energy development site.
But this thinking about what next is running to catch up with reality because we did not start early enough. We failed to have a planned transition when deep coal mining collapsed in the 1980s. We failed again in the 1990s with the closure of most of Scotland’s heavy industries. A lesson from Longannet is that we should recognise the writing on the wall for North Sea oil and gas and start now to plan an orderly transfer of skilled workers and investment from oil and gas to renewable energy and energy efficiency, and at the same time show an international lead on climate change.
The closure of Longannet is a milestone of major European significance on our way to a fossil-free Scotland and, eventually, a fossil-free world.
Dr Richard Dixon is Director of Friends of the Earth Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel