IN his Agenda article (“Tackle the child abuse and neglect of today for a healthier tomorrow”, The Herald, April 27), Matt Forde calls for an increased level of research investment to understand better the causes as well as the consequences of child abuse and neglect if Scotland’s future generations are to be better protected. I agree wholeheartedly that matters of child development and child abuse need more of a funding focus, given the extent to which the early years lay the grounding for later psychological health. But I would hope that this does not involve yet more re-inventions of the wheel – to which research in child development and education is notoriously prone.
We have known about the causes of child abuse and its implications for decades, as child development textbooks readily demonstrate, but where the child-care system (construed widely) repeatedly fails children is in the lack of understanding of risk, and how to deal with it. The words “risk” and “risk evaluation” do not appear in Mr Forde’s article, although he does refer to “professionals not talking to each other, not putting the picture together and missing opportunities to act” – these often being the findings of formal, after-the-event inquiries following episodes of serious harm or child fatalities. In many situations where there is appropriate recognition of risk, there is a reluctance to act, or workers are paralysed by judicial systems, and children are left in dysfunctional and damaging family or care situations for months – or years. So in a real sense, the “causes” of child abuse are to be found not only in the specific relationship dynamics within families, or in difficult family circumstances, but also in the sense-making deficits and reluctance or inability to act too often found in professional teams. If there is to be “more research” required, perhaps that is where it needs to be focused.
Dr Angus Macmillan,
76 Georgetown Road, Dumfries.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here