We are never too old to be children of nature. With that in mind, the Scottish Government’s investigations into a “natural health service” for the elderly are to be welcomed. The premise is that getting outdoors is beneficial for health and wellbeing. The problem is that barriers often stand in the way: poor health and immobility; lack of social connections; fear of falling; lack of motivation.
Together, though, we can overcome these problems. A Scottish Government-commissioned report by the James Hutton Institute suggests co-ordinated action between the public, voluntary and private sectors. The report also recommends “green prescribing” of outdoor recreation by doctors and other health professionals.
Existing projects give heart to the proposals, notably Forest Enterprise Scotland’s programme of woodland activities for people with early-stage dementia. Woodland walks in small groups, outdoor cooking, nature photography, fire lighting and willow sculpture, all have proved overwhelmingly positive experiences
Here lies proof that age need not be a dull, grey prison. As community ranger Gordon Harper put it: “The woodland environment offers a natural sensory experience which stimulates reminiscence, creates conversation and promotes engagement.”
Previous research has shown that the elderly are less likely to engage in outdoor recreation on a regular basis. It’s not so easy when you’re older – but, if possible, it’s well worth the effort. A walk is rarely regretted. The house is safe, and home may be where the heart is, but the legs long for elsewhere.
Fortunately, we all have free membership of nature’s gym and, for the Scottish Government, there are few new financial implications at present. Using existing projects and budgets, it’s simply a case of: where there’s a will there’s a way to the countryside. No one is underestimating the difficulties of motivation, physical ability and available opportunities to alert the often isolated elderly to new possibilities. But the natural health service can help. As initiatives go, it’s a breath of fresh air.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here