AS a historian who is also a secularist, I feel compelled to comment on Professor (formerly Bishop) Tom Wright’s recent intervention. He argued (“Professor: Jesus’s life should be taught in history lessons”, The Herald, September 27) that study of the life of Jesus should be included in the mainstream history curriculum in schools. This is indeed an interesting idea, but one which might best be characterised as unrealistic and misguided.
As Prof Wright will be aware, study of the “historical Jesus” is a complex area which requires a serious grasp of historical method and addressing complex and contradictory sources. What he is in fact proposing is a university course and not appropriate for the constraints of teaching history in secondary schools.
Secondly, as various commentators have already pointed out, more than half of Scotland’s population is known to identify as “not religious”. Given this social and cultural context it is bizarre to suggest that more Christianity in schools as opposed to less might be appropriate. If anything, if put into action, Prof Wright’s suggestion would likely damage history as a secondary school subject area by creating an impression that it was irrelevant and hopelessly out of touch with contemporary society.
If Prof Wright were serious about strengthening the place of history in Scottish then he might turn his attention to some of the problems our university departments are encountering. They are frequently under-resourced and viewed as a low priority by university managers. He might also lobby for action on the pathetic state of postgraduate funding, which has increasingly resulted in the perception that history is some kind of luxury subject open only to those who can raise the required fees for postgraduate study. In the long term, this is damaging the profession by threatening to turn it into a “genteel hobby” open to those who are able to pay for access, and this will adversely affect the relevance and credibility of history as an academic discipline. Perhaps these issues are less visible from the neatly-mown lawns and ivory towers of St Andrews?
More encouragingly, though, this debate has demonstrated that knowledge of the past and contesting how it is studied remain pertinent issues in Scottish society, and this can be seen through the level of comment which Prof Wright’s intervention has raised. Clearly, how we teach history and what content that teaching includes is a subject that matters for many. This is something we should be glad of. But I do not think it is appropriate that the secondary school history curriculum should be used as ammunition in the debate over the role of religion in Scottish education.
Charlie Lynch,
Secretary, Scottish Secular Society,
17 Queens Crescent, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel