I CAN'T be the only one wondering why the world's best athletes compete in two separate Olympic entities, the Olympics and the follow-on Paralympics. The former is for those whose bodies are considered physically/medically 100 per cent and the latter for those whose bodies are considered less than 100 per cent ... and yet they are all serious, talented, dedicated athletes.
I am not suggesting that an athlete with one leg should compete against an athlete with two, but why in this day and age of inclusion, integration, acceptance, and appreciation of difference can't we have one Olympics which showcases the abilities of all athletes in one occasion? Why shouldn't Clare Balding take us from an interview with Chris Mears gold medal winner) to one with Paul Blake (gold medal winner who has cerebral palsy) as part of the one Olympic event?
We already have understandable and acceptable segregation which recognises physical difference within the Olympics – for example, weight divisions in boxing/weight lifting, and of course the most obvious one being that women and men don't compete against each other. Bt they all still take part in the same sporting occasion as serious athletes.
In the efforts to include “disabled athletes”, the International Olympic Committee is surely actively segregating wonderfully dedicated athletes on the basis of disability rather than ability by holding another, separate Games for the other athletes.
Why can't all athletes at the top of their sport compete at the same Olympic Games within their own categories of competition?
Graham Haddow,
23 Church Road, Liff, Dundee.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel