PARENTS in Glasgow could have been forgiven for taking a jaundiced view of a pre-election pledge by the Scottish Government to double its offer of free childcare. The city’s council had retained in-house the bulk of the money made available to local authorities to fund the programme, leading to frustration. So it is good news Glasgow has removed the cap on funding places in the private sector. But it is not alone. Parents across Scotland have had difficulty accessing places offering hours that work for them, while a lack of portability meant they cannot seek more flexibility in the private sector.
The policy itself is laudable. Evidence that experiences in the early years can help shape a child for success in later life is overwhelming. But getting the balance right between flexibility, quality and affordability is tricky.
A promise of 1,100 hours a year of free early years education for three to five-year-olds is excellent in principle. But in many areas too few places are on offer in “partner” nurseries in the private sector. Critics say the budget has been cut, but councils have also, inexplicably, underspent by £140 million the money provided for free nursery provision.
Meanwhile, Freedom of Information requests by the group Fair Funding for our Kids (FFK) found councils short-changing private nurseries by as much as £492 a child, while 65 per cent of places on offer across the country were in nurseries which offered a maximum of half a day. FFK claims 650 new nurseries will be needed to deliver the Government’s pledge.
Good quality, affordable childcare could transform the economy, encouraging a generation of mothers back into the workforce. It could help tackle poverty and give thousands of children the best possible grounding for formal education. But other councils must follow Glasgow’s lead and all involved need to work together to make this ideal policy on paper work for real-world parents.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here