STEVEN FINN admits he is still searching for his elusive best, but is confident he served England well on a frustrating day as Sri Lanka held them up at Chester-le-Street.
England appeared likely to wrap up the Investec series with a second successive innings victory inside three days, after Sri Lanka were bowled out for 101 and asked to follow on 397 runs behind.
But half-centuries from their captain Angelo Mathews (80), opener Kaushal Silva (60) and Dinesh Chandimal (54no) made a mockery of their previous struggles as they closed on 309 for five.
Finn's solitary success, the wicket of Silva, came after he stirred himself up and found a little extra life in a docile pitch.
It was reward for a hard-working spell, and England's collective efforts, as Sri Lanka at last produced a worthwhile rearguard after collapses here and at Headingley last week.
For Finn, there were signs he is beginning to find his feet again after a slow start to the summer for club and country on his return from a side injury.
"It's no secret I've been searching for rhythm - it's been there in patches," he said.
"I wanted to smash the deck, to help with the rhythm.
"It's hard to find something as a bowler that makes it click, when you are searching for it - maybe I've been doing that this summer, I've been desperate for form and rhythm."
He has had to be patient, and was again - but tried to move up a gear by engaging in a battle, verbally at one point, with the batsman.
"I still feel I'm doing a job, but I haven't been 100 per cent good 100 per cent of the time - which I was in South Africa and last summer.
"It helps take your thought process away from the pitch - if looking for rhythm you're best doing that, getting yourself in a fight at the other end of the pitch, rather than at your own end.
"The umpires said don't use any bad language - which I adhered to - (and I decided to) run in as hard as I can."
England's four-man pace attack could only chip their way through the Sri Lanka order.
"I came out after tea trying to get into a fight and have a bit more intent on a wicket where it's not doing much for me on the length," added Finn.
"Given my height, it can be a bit more uncomfortable.
"I worked it out for myself.
"Our mantra has been trying to starve them of runs, and it will bring wickets - not bowl jaffas every ball. That was the way I felt I could starve them of runs."
England must hope for swifter progress on the fourth morning.
"It's been a good hard slog - we expected Sri Lanka to show more application," said Finn.
"They showed more intent runing between the wickets, and the pitch isn't 100 all out.
"We didn't have any pre-conceived ideas - in an ideal world, we'd have wrapped it up today.
"(But) it was going to be tough to get 10 wickets in a day - it's very slow and low.
"We have a four-over old ball tomorrow, and we have seen the new ball has done damage.
"We have two of the best new-ball bowlers (in the world) - so tomorrow is a great opportunity to make early inroads."
Sri Lanka were a different proposition with the bat second time round, and Silva confirmed there had been an urgent discussion about how they must improve.
He said: "I wouldn't say it was harsh words.
"It was just everyone knew what we are capable of."
They are still likely to lose the series here on Monday, however.
"We haven't done extraordinarily well, but we have gone one step up. That is important," the opener added.
"From the start of the second innings, we wanted to be positive.
"We showed that intent, even with the running between the wickets, being more aggressive.
"The problem is, if you play the ball in two minds, you end up getting out - so we'd rather be positive, even in defence.
"That's what we did from the start."
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here